https://tierce.edel.univ-poitiers.fr:443/tierce/index.php?id=194 Index de freedom of speech fr 0 https://tierce.edel.univ-poitiers.fr:443/tierce/index.php?id=156 Le rap est un objet culturel « populaire », à la fois mis au banc de la société car assimilé par le biais des médias à une musique « violente » et conjointement commercialisée massivement et adulée par une partie croissante de la population. Cette dualité l’a conduit devant les tribunaux comme on peut l’observer via les procès Sniper et Hamé. Le regard que porte la société à la question du rap est, dans ce contexte, intéressant à plusieurs titres pour l’historien. Rap is a "popular" cultural object, on one part marginalized because it is assimilated through the media to a "violent" music; and jointly marketed heavily and adored by an increasing part of the population. This duality led it to court as can be seen via the Sniper and Hame trial. The gaze of the society regarding the rap is, in this context, interesting for several reasons for the historian. These trials by the importance of fundamental they wave - mainly freedom of expression - act as mirrors for Justice who is forced to relive his own history to decide. Said history to be a good understanding builds on a long time and made the connection between the trial nineteenth centuries - Baudelaire, Sue, etc. - And those of today. The use of some articles of law calls because the letter of the law - the sacrosanct French principle of penal legality - is sometimes forgotten and that from the beginning of criminal codification of the law of the press to the example of Article 43 of the law of 29 July 1881. This freedom of application that have taken the judges in the nineteenth century and those of the XXI century during the trial rappers requires thinking about the history of the legislation and all it implies in terms of the history of representations. mar., 25 oct. 2016 15:06:55 +0200 jeu., 13 mars 2025 14:23:17 +0100 https://tierce.edel.univ-poitiers.fr:443/tierce/index.php?id=156